• Xun Chen, Jianbo Dai, Dan Li, Xingliang Huang, and Cehua Ou.
• Department of Pain Management, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou City, Sichuan Province, China.
• Pain Med. 2021 Jul 25; 22 (7): 1612-1618.

ObjectivesThe treatment for neuropathic pain is still a big challenge. Pulsed radiofrequency technique has been widely used to relieve neuropathic pain in recent years. The purpose of this study is to optimize the temperature for pulsed radiofrequency therapy.DesignAnimal, experimental study.MethodsSeventy-five male SD rats were randomly divided into five groups: Sham operation group (Sham group), chronic constriction injury group (CCI group), PRF 42°C group (P42 group), PRF 50°C group (P50 group), and PRF 60°C group (P60 group). The hindpaw withdrawal threshold (HWT), paw thermal withdrawal latency (PTWL), sciatic nerve structure, and the concentration of spinal methionine enkephalin(M-ENK) were detected to identify which temperature is the best for PRF treatment.ResultsPRF at 42°C, 50°C and 60°C significantly alleviated the pain in CCI rats. The therapeutic effects of 50°C and 60°C were similar, and both were better than 42°C. In addition, PRF using 42°C, 50°C, and 60°C mediated nerve injury to sciatic nerve were grade 1, 1, and 2, respectively. The concentration of M-ENK in spinal cord increased accompanying with the increasing of the temperature of PRF.ConclusionsPRF using 50°C could induce less damage while achieving better improvement of mechanical and thermal pain threshold than 42°C and 60°C in CCI rats, which may be achieved by promoting the expression of M-ENK in spinal cord.© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

14 keywords...

hide…