• Shu Qi Tan, Li Houng Chen, Dhilshad Bte Muhd Abdul Qadir, Bernard SM Chern, and George SH Yeo.
• Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.
• Ann Acad Med Singap. 2021 Jan 1; 50 (1): 5-15.

IntroductionUterine rupture is uncommon but has catastrophic implications on the pregnancy. A scarred uterus and abnormal placentation are known contributory factors. The aim of our study was to review the contributing factors, clinical presentation, complications and management of uterine rupture in our population in light of the changing nature of modern obstetric practices.MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted at KK Women's and Children's Hospital by studying proven cases of uterine rupture in the period between January 2003 and December 2014. These cases were analysed according to their past history, clinical presentation, complications, management and outcome.ResultsA total of 48 cases of proven uterine rupture were identified. The incidence of uterine rupture was 1 in 3,062 deliveries. The ratio of scarred uterus rupture to unscarred uterus rupture was approximately 3:1. The most common factor was previous lower segment caesarean section for the scarred group, followed by a history of laparoscopic myomectomy. Abdominal pain was the common clinical presentation in the antenatal period, while abnormal cardiotocography findings were the most common presentation in intrapartum rupture.ConclusionThere is a notable shift in the trend of uterine rupture cases given the increasing use of laparoscopic myomectomy and elective caesarean sections. While ruptures from these cases were few, their presentation in the antenatal period calls for diligent monitoring with informed patient involvement in their pregnancy care.

27 keywords...

hide…