• Ciara Hanley, Laura Donahoe, and Peter Slinger.
• Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, University of Toronto, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: ciara1804@gmail.com.
• J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 2021 Dec 1; 35 (12): 3760-3773.

AbstractAdvances in perioperative assessment and diagnostics, together with developments in anesthetic and surgical techniques, have considerably expanded the pool of patients who may be suitable for pulmonary resection. Thoracic surgical patients frequently are perceived to be at high perioperative risk due to advanced age, level of comorbidity, and the risks associated with pulmonary resection, which predispose them to a significantly increased risk of perioperative complications, increased healthcare resource use, and costs. The definition of what is considered "fit for surgery" in thoracic surgery continually is being challenged. However, no internationally standardized definition of prohibitive risk exists. Perioperative assessment traditionally concentrates on the "three-legged stool" of pulmonary mechanical function, parenchymal function, and cardiopulmonary reserve. However, no single criterion should exclude a patient from surgery, and there are other perioperative factors in addition to the tripartite assessment that need to be considered in order to more accurately assess functional capacity and predict individual perioperative risk. In this review, the authors aim to address some of the more erudite concepts that are important in preoperative risk assessment of the patient at potentially prohibitive risk undergoing pulmonary resection for malignancy.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

15 keywords...

hide…