• Christian N Burchill, Spencer S Seballos, Edmunds Z Reineks, and Michael P Phelan.
• J Emerg Nurs. 2021 Jul 1; 47 (4): 590-598.e3.

IntroductionThe aim of the study was to identify emergency nurses' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to blood sample hemolysis prevention and explore associations between these factors and demographic characteristics. The current state is unknown. Understanding baseline knowledge, attitudes, and practices addresses a gap in the literature.MethodAn exploratory, descriptive design with cross-sectional survey methodology employing a study-specific instrument was used.ResultsRequest for participation email was sent to a random sample of 5000 Emergency Nurses Association members, and 427 usable surveys were returned (response rate = 8.5%). Mean years in nursing was 13.85 (standard deviation = 10.78), and 226 (52.9%) were certified emergency nurses. Only 85 participants (19.9%) answered all 3 knowledge questions correctly. Answering the 3 knowledge questions correctly was significantly associated with being a certified emergency nurse (χ2 = 7.15, P < .01). Participant responses to attitude items about the sequelae of blood sample hemolysis were skewed toward agreement, and most attitude items were associated with whom participants reported as being primarily responsible for phlebotomy. Emergency nurses remain primarily responsible for phlebotomy as well as addressing hemolyzed samples, but few reported that blood sample hemolysis was addressed at a departmental level.DiscussionFindings suggest that emergency nurses lack some knowledge related to blood sample hemolysis prevention best practices. Attitudes toward phlebotomy practices may be 1 reason practice has not changed. Every effort should be made to prevent hemolyzed blood samples to decrease delays and costs in emergency care.Copyright © 2021 Emergency Nurses Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

16 keywords...

hide…