• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Nov 2021

    Comparative Study

    Four right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit types.

    • Robert G Willetts, John Stickley, Nigel E Drury, Chetan Mehta, Oliver Stumper, Natasha E Khan, Timothy J Jones, David J Barron, William J Brawn, and Phil Botha.
    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
    • J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2021 Nov 1; 162 (5): 1324-1333.e3.

    ObjectiveThe most durable valved right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduit for the repair of congenital heart defects in patients of different ages, sizes, and anatomic substrate remains uncertain.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of 4 common right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits used in a single institution over 30 years, using univariable and multivariable models of time-to-failure to analyze freedom from conduit dysfunction, reintervention, and replacement.ResultsBetween 1988 and 2018, 959 right ventricle to pulmonary artery conduits were implanted: 333 aortic homografts, 227 pulmonary homografts, 227 composite porcine valve conduits, and 172 bovine jugular vein conduits. Patients weighed 1.6 to 98.3 kg (median 15.3 kg), and median duration of follow-up was 11.4 years, with 505 (52.2%) conduits developing dysfunction, 165 (17.2%) requiring catheter intervention, and 415 (43.2%) being replaced. Greater patient weight, conduit z-score, type and position, as well as catheter intervention were predictors of freedom from replacement. Multivariable analysis demonstrated inferior durability for smaller composite porcine valve conduits, with excellent durability for larger diameter conduits of the same type. Bovine jugular vein conduit longevity was inferior to that of homografts in all but the smallest patients. Freedom from dysfunction at 8 years was 60.7% for aortic homografts, 72% for pulmonary homografts, 51.2% for composite porcine valve conduits, and 41.3% for bovine jugular vein conduits. Judicious oversizing of the conduit improved conduit durability in all patients, but to the greatest extent in patients weighing 5 to 20 kg.ConclusionsPulmonary and aortic homografts had greater durability than xenograft conduits, particularly in patients weighing 5 to 20 kg. Judicious oversizing was the most significant surgeon-modifiable factor affecting conduit longevity.Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.