• Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Jan 1998

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Haemolysis following rapid experimental red blood cell transfusion--an evaluation of two infusion pumps.

    • T G Hansen, U Sprogøe-Jakobsen, C M Pedersen, K S Olsen, and S R Kristensen.
    • Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
    • Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1998 Jan 1; 42 (1): 57-62.

    BackgroundThe vast majority of infusion pumps used for rapid transfusion of large amounts of blood have never been properly examined regarding their influence on the quality of the red blood cells (RBCs) infused. In this study, we evaluated the effect of two different infusion pumps on the degree of RBC destruction following rapid experimental blood transfusion.MethodsDivided into 2 groups according to age, 30 u of SAGM RBCs were infused through an experimental transfusion model by either a manual roller pump (MRP) or a pressure infusor pump (PIP). Fresh (i.e stored for 8-11 d) RBCs, 20 u, and 10 u of older (i.e. stored for 25-33 d) RBCs were randomly allocated to infusion with either of the two pumps. The rate of infusion was as fast as possible with the MRP, and with the PIP adjusted with an external applied pressure of 300 mm Hg. RBC samples collected before and after infusion were analyzed for total haemoglobin, free haemoglobin, haematocrit, total free potassium, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and the percentage of haemolysis. The time spent for each transfusion was measured by a stop watch.ResultsFollowing infusion, a marginal increase (i.e. considerably below 0.8%) in the percentage of haemolysis and LDH content was seen with both pumps. This increase was only statistically significant when RBCs stored for 8-11 d were used (P = 0.002 for both parameters). Irrespective of the age of the RBCs, no differences between the two pumps could be detected. Compared to the PIP, infusion with the MRP could be accomplished significantly faster, i.e. median 5.9 ml/s (5.2-6.4 ml/s) versus 2.9 ml/s (2.5-3.2 ml/s), (P < 0.0001).ConclusionsBoth the pumps used in this study are safe alternatives for rapid transfusion of RBCs; however, with MRP this can be accomplished approximately twice as fast as with the PIP.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…