• Spine · Aug 2013

    Comparative Study

    Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for chronic spinal cord injury in rats: comparative study between intralesional and intravenous transplantation.

    • Jang-Woon Kim, Kee-Yong Ha, Jan Noel Molon, and Young-Hoon Kim.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. boscoa@empal.com
    • Spine. 2013 Aug 1;38(17):E1065-74.

    Study DesignAnimal experimental study.ObjectiveTo present experimental evidence for mesenchymal cell therapy for spinal cord injury (SCI).Summary Of Background DataPrior to clinical application of stem cell therapy for SCI, many critical issues have to be addressed including efficiency, safety, method of transplantation, and differentiation of the transplanted cells.MethodsChronic contusive SCI was induced in 36 Sprague-Dawley rats and randomly assigned to the intralesional (IL), intravenous (IV), or control groups. At 6 weeks post injury, allogenic mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs, 1 × 10 cells) were transplanted either intralesionally or intravenously for the intervention groups. Engraftment of the transplanted MSCs was evaluated with PKH 26 staining. Differentiation was evaluated using double stain with neuronal and glial cell markers. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor (NGF) were used for neurotrophic factor expression. Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor rating scale was used for evaluation of functional recovery.ResultsThe estimated engraftment percentage of the transplanted cells in the IL group and IV group were 36.5%, and 15.5%, respectively. The engraftment of the transplanted MSCs was higher in the IL group than in the IV group. Most of the transplanted MSCs were colocalized with GFAP in both transplantation groups. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and NGF expression (Western blot and real-time polymerase chain reaction) in the injured spinal cord was higher in both transplanted groups compared with those in the control group. At 6 weeks post transplantation, the mean Basso, Beattie, and Bresnahan locomotor scales in the IL, IV, and control groups were 5.63 ± 0.89, 5.63 ± 1.03, and 2.88 ± 0.44, respectively. The functional recovery seen in the rats that underwent transplantation was significantly better than that in the control group (P < 0.05).ConclusionAlthough the number of engrafted cells and expression of neurotrophic factors were lower in the IV group than those in the IL group, both IL and IV transplantation of MSC in the chronic SCI gave a significant clinical improvement. However, there were no differences in differentiation of the transplanted cells between the IL group and IV group. Astrocytic differentiation of the transplanted cells was predominant.Level Of EvidenceN/A.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.