-
Cahiers d'anesthésiologie · Jan 1993
Review Comparative Study[A comparative study of recovery following maintenance of anesthesia with propofol or isoflurane. An attempt to synthesize current data].
- J P Carpentier, O Riou, R Petrognani, P Seignot, and M Aubert.
- Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, Hôpital d'Instruction, Marseille Armées.
- Cah Anesthesiol. 1993 Jan 1; 41 (4): 327-30.
AbstractQuality of recovery is a means to improve anaesthetic safety during postoperative time, in post-anaesthesia recovery room and especially when the patient returns to his unity. The comparison of recovery after maintenance of anaesthesia with propofol or isoflurane shows that, for 50 to 60 min surgical procedures, results are significantly better with isoflurane. Review of literature shows that, for less than 30 min operations, propofol seems to give best recovery. For more than 30 min operations, isoflurane enables better quality recovery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..