• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Sep 2013

    Multicenter Study

    Clinical features and surgical outcomes of lumbar spinal stenosis in patients aged 80 years or older: a multi-center retrospective study.

    • Yoshiro Nanjo, Hideki Nagashima, Toshiyuki Dokai, Yuki Hamamoto, Hirokazu Hashiguchi, Hiroyuki Ishii, Yasuhiro Kameyama, Yasuo Morio, Masaaki Murata, Atsushi Tanida, Shinji Tanishima, and Ryota Teshima.
    • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Tottori University, 36-1 Nishi-cho, Yonago, Tottori, Japan. nanjo@med.tottori-u.ac.jp
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013 Sep 1;133(9):1243-8.

    IntroductionWith increased aging of the population, spine surgeons have more opportunity to treat elderly patients for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical features and surgical outcomes for LSS in the elderly aged 80 years or older.Materials And MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed 702 consecutive patients with LSS who underwent decompression surgery without fusion between 2006 and 2010. Patients with other conditions that could affect functional status were excluded from this study. Of the remaining 304 patients, 241 with LSS whose condition could be evaluated 6 months at least after surgery were analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 14.4 months (range 6-60 months). There were 144 males and 97 females aged 45-93 years old (average: 72.2 years old). Patients were divided into two age groups: 80 years or older (Group A, 46 patients) and under 80 years of age (Group B, 195 patients). We evaluated differences in the clinical features and surgical outcomes between the two groups.ResultsThere were no significant differences in surgical levels, the number of operation levels, operation times, or the amount of intraoperative bleeding between Groups A and B. The percentages of patients with comorbidities were 73.9 % in Group A and 60.0 % in Group B, which were not significantly different. There were no significant differences in Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the final follow-up between the two groups. Furthermore, recovery ratios 6 months postoperatively and at final follow-up were similar between the two groups. The percentages of patients with postoperative complications were 19.6 % in Group A and 13.3 % in Group B, which were not significantly different.ConclusionsThis multi-center retrospective study demonstrated that the benefits and risks of decompression surgery for LSS were similar between patients aged over 80 years and those under 80 years. Therefore, decompression surgery is a reasonable treatment even for elderly patients aged over 80 years.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.