• Ewelina Bogumiła Zuba, Wojciech Francuzik, Przemysław Malicki, Agnieszka Osmola-Mańkowska, and Dorota Jenerowicz.
• Ewelina Bogumiła Zuba, MD, Medical University of Poznan, 49 Przybyszewskiego St, 60-355 Poznan, Poland; ewelina.zuba@interia.pl.
• Acta Dermatovenerol Croat. 2016 Apr 1; 24 (1): 73-7.

AbstractDear Editor, Ultraviolet (UV) radiation is a well-known physical hazard responsible for photoaging, photoallergic, and phototoxic reactions as well as carcinogenesis, including life-threatening melanomas (1,2). Overexposure to both natural and artificial UV radiation is a public health concern. 30% of cancers diagnosed worldwide are skin cancers. Approximately three million non-melanoma skin cancers and 132 000 new cases of melanomas are diagnosed globally each year (3). Sunburns, especially in childhood, are a very important risk factor for melanomas. Several studies demonstrated a positive association between sunbed use and an increased incidence of malignant melanoma (4). Current medical and cosmetology students will soon be knowledge providers about the risks of excessive exposure to UV radiation and prophylaxis of its consequences. Our aim was to evaluate their knowledge about the side effects of ultraviolet radiation and tanning behaviors. Details on the knowledge and habits of students were obtained during classes at the Poznan University of Medical Sciences. With approval from the Institutional Bioethical Committee, a 41-question anonymous survey was conducted in the spring of 2012 among 190 medical (1-6 year) and cosmetology students (1-5 year). The mean age of the study group was 22.3 years (standard deviation (SD) = 2.4 years), range 19-28 years. The survey was composed of closed and open-ended questions prepared by the authors. The first part of the form included demographic data: gender, age, degree course, and school year. The students were also asked about their reaction to sunlight, sunburns in childhood, and personal and family history of skin cancers or dysplastic nevus syndrome. The factual section of the survey contained questions evaluating responder knowledge about sunbeds and risk of UV radiation as well as their personal tanning habits. The open-ended questions asked responders to provide definitions of: skin phototype, sun protection factor (SPF), and tanorexia. The students were additionally asked to mention possible side effects of solar radiation and contraindications to sunbeds and drugs, which may induce photosensitivity. Statistical analysis was performed using The R Project for Statistical Computing. Chi-squared test was used to compare both sun-risk knowledge and tanning behaviors between medical and cosmetology students. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant. We distributed 220 questionnaires and received 190 (86%) eligible for evaluation. Table 1 shows the study population. Gender distribution among groups was uneven, with significantly more male subjects in the medicine program group. We decided to include their answers in this study to provide an unbiased view of both of those programs. Where appropriate, we additionally provided comparisons between female subjects in both groups to prove that differences were not solely due to uneven gender distribution. When we asked students to define skin phototype, cosmetology students more frequently gave a correct definition. In the group of students who stated they knew the definition of skin phototype, medical students were significantly more frequently wrong when we asked them to explain the term in their own words. Cosmetology students correctly answered significantly more knowledge checking questions (Table 2). When we asked students to list photosensitizing agents, students of the cosmetology program gave twice as many correct answers per respondent as students of the medicine program (see Table 3). Cosmetology students more frequently listed retinoids, while medical students listed tetracyclines as the main photosensitizing drug. The most common answer in the cosmetology group was the herb of Hypericum perforatum, although it is not considered a drug. Psoralens were identified by only 4 medical students as a possible cause of phototoxicity. When students were asked to list adverse effects of sunbathing, we specifically looked for three responses (see Table 4). Cosmetology students listed those answers significantly more often than medical students. Students of the cosmetology program gave significantly more correct answers when asked to list contraindications for sunbathing. While medical students reported mainly pregnancy (as a contraindication for most medical procedures), cosmetology students reported history of skin cancer as the most frequent answer (Table 5). Cosmetology students (89.04%) stated they visited a tanning salon more often than medical students (46.55%) (P<0.0001). When we restricted this analysis to only female subjects there still was a significant difference (P=0.0002) between cosmetology and medical female students. Cosmetology students reported lower incidence of sunscreen use (83.78% vs. 97.39%; P=0.0019). The age of the first tanning studio visit was also lower for cosmetology students (mean = 16.5 years) than medical students (mean = 17.2 years), (P=0.0290). Figure 1 illustrates the frequency of student tanning studio visits; the difference between groups was significant (P=0.0308). Skin cancers, dysplastic nevi syndrome, and precancerous lesions were reported in the family history by 19 students (10.00%). 12 of those students (63.16%) were also tanning salons users. 85 students (44.74%) reported a history of a sunburn in their childhood and over half of them continue visiting tanning salons. Some American (5) and French (6) studies assessed medical student knowledge and behaviors concerning sun risk and its prevention. The results of these studies indicated that medical school students did not have a satisfactory awareness about sun risk hazards. The French evaluation showed medical student knowledge was comparable to that of the French general population. Studies evaluating Polish student knowledge (7-9) showed ignorance of the term Fitzpatrick's skin phototype. We emphasize this because patients with phototype 1 and 2 are more susceptible to the development of skin cancers (10) and ignorance in this matter may be dangerous. UV rays may promote drug-induced photosensitivity reactions such as phototoxicity and photoallergy (1), with the most common causes being: non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (ketoprofen, ibuprofen, piroxicam, diclofenac), cardiovascular drugs (furosemid, amiodarone, thiazides), antibiotics (tetracyclines, ciprofloxacine, sulfonamides), psoralens, and oral contraceptives (11). Our study found deficient knowledge about drugs which may trigger photosensitivity reactions. Cosmetology students reported significantly more risky tanning behavior but did better in knowledge checking questions, which may be explained by their personal interest in this subject or by educational focus due to their major. We suggest that better knowledge about sunbathing in general is due to increased interest in this matter (not solely due to formal education) and this interest derives from a positive attitude towards a tanned appearance. It has been proven that sunbathing shows signs of addictive behavior (12). Tanorexia as a term was more widely known among cosmetology students, which may illustrate that although students knew about the addictive properties of tanning, they were sure that this did not apply to them. Many studies showed that increased knowledge did not translate into safer tanning habits (13,14). Our study agrees with those findings. Our study demonstrated that medical and cosmetology student knowledge about sunbeds and risk of UV radiation is deficient. However, cosmetology students demonstrated better knowledge than medical students. Future cosmetologists may be better information providers about sun risk and its prevention. On the other hand, students of the cosmetology faculty tended to tan more often and longer and engage in more risky behavior despite being aware of the hazards of tanning. They may be more likely to develop skin cancers in the future.

15 keywords...

hide…