• Donee A Alexander, Amanda Northcross, Theodore Karrison, Oludare Morhasson-Bello, Nathaniel Wilson, Omolola M Atalabi, Anindita Dutta, Damilola Adu, Tope Ibigbami, John Olamijulo, Dayo Adepoju, Oladosu Ojengbede, and Christopher O Olopade.
• Department of Medicine and Center for Global Health, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.
• Environ Int. 2018 Feb 1; 111: 152-163.

BackgroundHousehold air pollution (HAP) exposure has been linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes.ObjectivesA randomized controlled trial was undertaken in Ibadan, Nigeria to determine the impact of cooking with ethanol on pregnancy outcomes.MethodsThree-hundred-twenty-four pregnant women were randomized to either the control (continued cooking using kerosene/firewood stove, n=162) or intervention group (received ethanol stove, n=162). Primary outcome variables were birthweight, preterm delivery, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and occurrence of miscarriage/stillbirth.ResultsMean birthweights for ethanol and controls were 3076 and 2988g, respectively; the difference, 88g, (95% confidence interval: -18g to 194g), was not statistically significant (p=0.10). After adjusting for covariates, the difference reached significance (p=0.020). Rates of preterm delivery were 6.7% (ethanol) and 11.0% (control), (p=0.22). Number of miscarriages was 1(ethanol) vs. 4 (control) and stillbirths was 3 (ethanol) vs. 7 (control) (both non-significant). Average gestational age at delivery was significantly (p=0.015) higher in ethanol-users (39.2weeks) compared to controls (38.2weeks). Perinatal mortality (stillbirths and neonatal deaths) was twice as high in controls compared to ethanol-users (7.9% vs. 3.9%; p=0.045, after adjustment for covariates). We did not detect significant differences in exposure levels between the two treatment arms, perhaps due to large seasonal effects and high ambient air pollution levels.ConclusionsTransition from traditional biomass/kerosene fuel to ethanol reduced adverse pregnancy outcomes. However, the difference in birthweight was statistically significant only after covariate adjustment and the other significant differences were in tertiary endpoints. Our results are suggestive of a beneficial effect of ethanol use. Larger trials are required to validate these findings.Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

35 keywords...

hide…