• Philippe Morimont, Bernard Lambermont, Thomas Desaive, Nathalie Janssen, Geoffrey Chase, and Vincent D'Orio.
• Medical Intensive Care Unit, Emergency Department, University Hospital of Liège, and Faculty of Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium. ph.morimont@chu.ulg.ac.be
• Bmc Cardiovasc Disor. 2012 Mar 1; 12: 13.

BackgroundPeak first derivative of femoral artery pressure (arterial dP/dtmax) derived from fluid-filled catheter remains questionable to assess left ventricular (LV) contractility during shock. The aim of this study was to test if arterial dP/dtmax is reliable for assessing LV contractility during various hemodynamic conditions such as endotoxin-induced shock and catecholamine infusion.MethodsVentricular pressure-volume data obtained with a conductance catheter and invasive arterial pressure obtained with a fluid-filled catheter were continuously recorded in 6 anaesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs. After a stabilization period, endotoxin was infused to induce shock. Catecholamines were transiently administrated during shock. Arterial dP/dtmax was compared to end-systolic elastance (Ees), the gold standard method for assessing LV contractility.ResultsEndotoxin-induced shock and catecholamine infusion lead to significant variations in LV contractility. Overall, significant correlation (r=0.51; p<0.001) but low agreement between the two methods were observed. However, a far better correlation with a good agreement were observed when positive-pressure ventilation induced an arterial pulse pressure variation (PPV)≤11% (r=0.77; p<0.001).ConclusionWhile arterial dP/dtmax and Ees were significantly correlated during various hemodynamic conditions, arterial dP/dtmax was more accurate for assessing LV contractility when adequate vascular filling, defined as PPV≤11%, was achieved.

24 keywords...

hide…