• Gastrointest. Endosc. · May 1992

    Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial

    Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a prospective randomized study comparing continuous supplemental oxygen via the nasal or oral route.

    • G D Bell, A Quine, J H Antrobus, A Morden, S M Burridge, T J Coady, and J Lee.
    • Department of Medicine, Ipswich Hospital, Suffolk, United Kingdom.
    • Gastrointest. Endosc. 1992 May 1; 38 (3): 319-25.

    AbstractWe have examined the efficacy of supplemental oxygen in preventing episodes of significant arterial desaturation (SpO2 less than 90%) during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. We have compared the effects of 2 liters.min-1 of oxygen given orally via the bite-guard with the same flow rate via nasal cannulas and have also examined the effects of pre-oxygenation. Results of this study at a flow rate of 2 liters.min-1 have been compared with previously published results at a flow rate of 3 liters.min-1. Although in this study fewer episodes of desaturation were seen in the orally supplemented group compared with the nasal group, the difference observed was not statistically significant. Pre-oxygenation significantly reduced episodes of desaturation (SpO2 less than 90%, p less than 0.01) and prevented SpO2 falls below 85% in all patients studied. Supplemental oxygen given at a rate of 2 liters.min-1 was as effective as that given at a rate of 3 liters.min-1 in preventing significant desaturation, as previously defined, during the procedure. We therefore recommend the use of supplemental oxygen at a flow rate of 2 liters.min-1 in all high risk patients and conclude that the oral route has practical advantages and is at least as effective as nasal cannulas.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.