• Spine · Nov 2013

    An institutional six-year trend analysis of the neurological outcome after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year trend analysis of a single institution.

    • Alexander Aichmair, Marios G Lykissas, Federico P Girardi, Andrew A Sama, Darren R Lebl, Fadi Taher, Frank P Cammisa, and Alexander P Hughes.
    • *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Spine and Scoliosis Service, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY; and †Sektion für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Centrum für Muskuloskeletale Chirurgie, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
    • Spine. 2013 Nov 1;38(23):E1483-90.

    Study DesignRetrospective case series.ObjectiveTo evaluate the proportional trend over time of neurological deficits after lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at a single institution.Summary Of Background DataBecause lumbar nerve roots converge to run as the lumbar plexus within or less frequently underneath the posterior part of the psoas muscle, they are prone to iatrogenic damage during the transpsoas approach in LLIF, and adverse postoperative neurological sequelae remain a major concern.MethodsThe electronic medical records and office notes of 451 patients who had consecutively undergone LLIF between March 2006 and April 2012 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for reports on postoperative neurological deficits.ResultsA total of 293 patients (173 females and 120 males) met the study inclusion criteria and were followed postoperatively for a mean period of 15.4 ± 9.2 months (range: 6-53 mo). The number of included patients who underwent LLIF at our institution was 47 in the years 2006 to 2008 (group A), 155 in 2009 to 2010 (group B), and 91 in 2011 to 2012 (group C). Our data indicate a decreasing proportional trend during the past 6 years for postoperative sensory deficits (SDs), motor deficits (MDs), and anterior thigh pain (TP). The decreasing trends were statistically significant for the proportion of SDs in the immediate postoperative setting (P = 0.018) and close to statistically significant for SDs at last follow-up (P = 0.126), TP immediately after surgery (P = 0.098), and TP at last follow-up (P = 0.136).ConclusionTo the authors' best knowledge, this study constitutes the largest series of this sort to date, with regard to both sample size and study period. The present data indicate a decreasing proportional trend over time for SDs, MDs, and anterior TP, which can be considered a representation of an institutional learning curve during a 6-year time period of performing LLIF.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.