-
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. · Aug 2011
Comparative StudyMammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to tumor characteristics.
- Lusine Yaghjyan, Graham A Colditz, Laura C Collins, Stuart J Schnitt, Bernard Rosner, Celine Vachon, and Rulla M Tamimi.
- Department of Surgery, Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University in St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, USA.
- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 3; 103 (15): 1179-89.
BackgroundFew studies that investigated the associations between breast density and subsequent breast cancer according to tumor characteristics have produced inconclusive findings. We aimed to determine whether the associations between breast density and subsequent breast cancer varied by tumor characteristics.MethodsWe included 1042 postmenopausal women diagnosed with breast cancer between June 1, 1989, and June 30, 2004, and 1794 matched control subjects from the Nurses' Health Study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of 121 701 registered female nurses across the United States. Breast density was estimated from digitized images using computerized techniques. Information on breast cancer risk factors was obtained prospectively from biennial questionnaires before the date of cancer diagnosis for case subjects and matched control subjects. Polychotomous logistic regression was used to assess associations of breast density with tumor subtypes based on invasiveness, histology, size, grade, receptor status, and involvement of lymph nodes. All tests of statistical significance were two-sided.ResultsThe risk of breast cancer increased progressively with increase in percent breast density (P(trend) < .001). Women with higher breast density (≥50%) showed a 3.39-fold (odds ratio = 3.39, 95% confidence interval = 2.46 to 4.68) increased risk of breast cancer compared with women with lower breast density (<10%). The associations between breast density and breast cancer risk were stronger for in situ compared with invasive tumors (P(heterogeneity) < .01), high-grade compared with low-grade tumors (P(heterogeneity) = .02), larger (>2 cm) compared with smaller (≤2 cm) tumors (P(heterogeneity) < .01), and estrogen receptor-negative compared with estrogen receptor-positive tumors (P(heterogeneity) = .04). There were no differences in associations by tumor histology, involvement of lymph nodes, and progesterone receptor and HER2 status (P(heterogeneity) > .05).ConclusionsThe findings suggest that higher mammographic density is associated with more aggressive tumor characteristics and also with in situ tumors.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.