• Anna K Brady, Wade Brown, Joshua L Denson, Gretchen Winter, Abesh Niroula, Lekshmi Santhosh, and W Graham Carlos.
• Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.
• ATS Sch. 2020 Dec 1; 1 (4): 395-405.

BackgroundEndotracheal intubation in the intensive care unit (ICU) is a high-risk procedure. Competence in endotracheal intubation is a requirement for Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) training programs, but fellow experience as the primary operator in intubating ICU patients has not been described on a large scale.ObjectiveWe hypothesized that significant variation surrounding endotracheal intubation practices in medical ICUs exists in United States (US) PCCM training programs.MethodsWe administered a survey to a convenience sample of US PCCM fellows to elicit typical intubation practices in the medical ICU.Results89 discrete US PCCM and Internal Medicine CCM training programs (77% response rate) were represented. At 43% of programs, the PCCM fellow was "always or almost always" designated the primary operator for intubation of a medical ICU patient, whereas at 21% of programs, the PCCM fellow was "rarely or never" the primary operator responsible for intubating in the ICU. Factors influencing this variation included time of day, hospital policies, attending skill or preference, ICU census and acuity, and patient factors. There was an association between location of the training program, but not program size, and whether the PCCM fellow was the primary operator.ConclusionThere is significant variation in whether PCCM fellows are the primary operators to intubate medical ICU patients during training. Further work should explore how this variation affects fellow career development and competence in intubation.

4 keywords...

hide…