• Martin O Culjat, David Goldenberg, Priyamvada Tewari, and Rahul S Singh.
• Center for Advanced Surgical and Interventional Technology (CASIT), UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. mculjat@mednet.ucla.edu
• Ultrasound Med Biol. 2010 Jun 1; 36 (6): 861-73.

AbstractThe characterization and calibration of ultrasound imaging systems requires tissue-mimicking phantoms with known acoustic properties, dimensions and internal features. Tissue phantoms are available commercially for a range of medical applications. However, commercial phantoms may not be suitable in ultrasound system design or for evaluation of novel imaging techniques. It is often desirable to have the ability to tailor acoustic properties and phantom configurations for specific applications. A multitude of tissue-mimicking materials and phantoms are described in the literature that have been created using a variety of materials and preparation techniques and that have modeled a range of biological systems. This paper reviews ultrasound tissue-mimicking materials and phantom fabrication techniques that have been developed over the past four decades, and describes the benefits and disadvantages of the processes. Both soft tissue and hard tissue substitutes are explored.Copyright 2010 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

7 keywords...

hide…