• A F Stern.
• CNWL NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PL, UK.
• Occup Med (Lond). 2016 Nov 1; 66 (8): 636-642.

BackgroundFormal, structured annual appraisals are now a regulatory requirement for all doctors and must meet the standards stipulated by the General Medical Council (GMC), including connection with a designated body.AimsTo investigate occupational physicians' opinions and experience of the first year of appraisals for revalidation.MethodsMembers of the Society of Occupational Medicine (SOM) were surveyed electronically regarding the appraisal process and its software. A quiz tested knowledge of the requirements and underlying principles and regulations of appraisal for revalidation.ResultsIn total, 163 responses were received, with 57 free-text comments. Respondents spent a mean of 31h on the appraisal process (range 0-200h). Less than half of respondents said they had a clear understanding of the appraisal process. Most respondents (88 and 92%) reported difficulties with the appraisal process and the appraisal software. Only 22% felt the time taken for the appraisal process was proportionate to the value gained. Overall, there was support for appraisal and in particular for SOM appraisers, but only half of the respondents found it useful. The average quiz score was 11 out of 15 (74%) with only one respondent scoring full marks. About 25% of respondents were not aware that the responsible officer is obliged to act on any concerns raised. The free-text comments suggested that some physicians found the process costly and stressful.ConclusionsThe findings suggest that the time requirements and process of appraisal for occupational physicians could be improved, and clearer, comprehensive and more accessible guidance should be developed.© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

3 keywords...

hide…