-
- Matthias Mayr, David Niederseer, and Josef Niebauer.
- Department of Sports Medicine, Prevention and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
- Am. J. Med. 2011 Jun 1; 124 (6): 489-97.
AbstractSince the discovery of endothelial progenitor cells in 1997, the scientific world has seen their ups and downs. There has been much discussion about the detection methods of endothelial progenitor cells and their diagnostic and predictive value. A lack of standardized methods to define endothelial progenitor cells has led to a number of nomenclatures and measuring methods that are difficult for clinicians to oversee. Therefore, only specialized hematologists and cardiologists were aware of their existence. Now it is time for a change: Most of the controversies have been eliminated by elaborate studies. This review aims to give an overview to the clinically working physician about the measurement, diagnostic potential, predictive value, and therapeutic potential of endothelial progenitor cells.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*,_underline_or**bold**. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>and subscript<sub>text</sub>. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3., hyphens-or asterisks*. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com) - Images can be included with:
 - For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote..