• United European Gastroenterol J · Nov 2020

    Tumour-stroma ratio has poor prognostic value in non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer: A multi-centre case-cohort study.

    • Hao Dang, Gabi W van Pelt, Krijn Jc Haasnoot, Yara Backes, Sjoerd G Elias, Tom Cj Seerden, Matthijs P Schwartz, Bernhard Wm Spanier, Wouter H de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel, Jeroen D van Bergeijk, Koen Kessels, Joost Mj Geesing, John N Groen, Frank Ter Borg, Frank Hj Wolfhagen, Cornelis A Seldenrijk, Mihaela G Raicu, Anya N Milne, Anja Ug van Lent, Lodewijk Aa Brosens, Offerhaus G Johan A GJA Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands., Peter D Siersema, Rob Aem Tollenaar, James Ch Hardwick, Lukas Jac Hawinkels, Leon Mg Moons, Miangela M Lacle, Wilma E Mesker, Jurjen J Boonstra, and Dutch T1 CRC Working Group.
    • Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
    • United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Nov 19: 2050640620975324.

    BackgroundCurrent risk stratification models for early invasive (T1) colorectal cancer are not able to discriminate accurately between prognostic favourable and unfavourable tumours, resulting in over-treatment of a large (>80%) proportion of T1 colorectal cancer patients. The tumour-stroma ratio (TSR), which is a measure for the relative amount of desmoplastic tumour stroma, is reported to be a strong independent prognostic factor in advanced-stage colorectal cancer, with a high stromal content being associated with worse prognosis and survival. We aimed to investigate whether the TSR predicts clinical outcome in patients with non-pedunculated T1 colorectal cancer.MethodsHematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained tumour tissue slides from a retrospective multi-centre case cohort of patients with non-pedunculated surgically treated T1 colorectal cancer were assessed for TSR by two independent observers who were blinded for clinical outcomes. The primary end point was adverse outcome, which was defined as the presence of lymph node metastasis in the resection specimen or colorectal cancer recurrence during follow-up.ResultsAll 261 patients in the case cohort had H&E slides available for TSR scoring. Of these, 183 were scored as stroma-low, and 78 were scored as stroma-high. There was moderate inter-observer agreement (κ = 0.42). In total, 41 patients had lymph node metastasis, 17 patients had recurrent cancer and five had both. Stroma-high tumours were not associated with an increased risk for an adverse outcome (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.37-1.18; p = 0.163).ConclusionsOur study emphasises that existing prognosticators may not be simply extrapolated to T1 colorectal cancers, even though their prognostic value has been widely validated in more advanced-stage tumours.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.