• Moran Slavin, Shmuel Avital, Yael Einbinder, Barak Benjamin, and Roye Inbar.
• Department of Surgery B, Meir Medical Center, Kfar Saba, Israel.
• Isr Med Assoc J. 2021 Mar 1; 23 (3): 174-179.

BackgroundPeritoneal dialysis (PD) is a treatment option for patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and cardiorenal syndrome (CRS).ObjectivesTo evaluate the outcome of this patient population.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted of patients who underwent an open or laparoscopic insertion of a PD catheter at our institution between 2009 and 2017. Data included demographics, peri-operative parameters, and long-term outcome. Patient and technique survival curves are presented, including subgroup analysis by method of catheter insertion and techniques for infection prevention.ResultsThe study population included 95 men and 42 women, aged 65.7 ± 12.4 years. Mean follow-up was 34.6 ± 27.3 months. Open insertion was performed in 113 cases, while 24 underwent laparoscopic insertion. There was no difference in technique survival between these groups (P = 0.943). Removal of the catheter was required in 66% of patients. Median technique survival was 12.1 months. Two-year technique survival was 37% and 5-year technique survival was 12%. The leading cause for catheter removal was infection (69%). Application of measures for prevention of infections were significantly associated with prolonged technique survival (P = 0.001). Technique survival after 2 years was 38% with the application of a single measure and 57% with the application of two measures (P = 0.001). CRS patients (n=24) had a significantly lower overall survival rate (2-year survival 20% vs. 74%, P = 0.001).ConclusionsThe method of catheter insertion has no effect on technique survival. Prevention of infections is the most significant factor for improving the technique survival rates.

26 keywords...

hide…