-
- Danny Chu, Patrick Chan, Lawrence M Wei, Chris C Cook, Thomas G Gleason, Victor O Morell, and Vinay Badhwar.
- Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
- Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2015 Dec 1; 100 (6): 2147-50; discussion 2150.
BackgroundThe Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) quality benchmarks guide clinical outcome improvement in cardiac surgery. Failure to rescue (FTR) from postoperative morbidity is a proposed metric of program quality. We examined the effect of a quality improvement initiative guided by STS quality measures on outcomes and FTR.MethodsProspectively collected STS data on 3,065 consecutive patients who underwent nonemergency cardiac operations at a single institution from January 1, 2010, to January 31, 2014, were retrospectively analyzed. On January 1, 2012, the quality improvement initiative was implemented. Clinical outcomes and FTR rates were compared between operations performed before (group A) and after (group B) implementation.ResultsSTS predicted preoperative mortality and composite of mortality plus morbidity were similar in group A and group B (2.9% ± 3.7% vs 3.1% ± 4.0%, p = 0.21; 17.8% ± 12.1% vs 18.3% ± 12.4%, p = 0.24, respectively). However, the observed mortality and composite mortality plus morbidity were lower in group B vs group A (31 of 1,576 [2.0%] vs 46 of 1,489 [3.1%], p = 0.05; 168 of 1,576 [10.7%] vs 301 of 1,489 [20.2%], p = 0.0001, respectively). Despite clinical outcome improvement, no differences in FTR rates were observed across all seven major morbidity indicators in group A vs B (35 of 290 [12.1%] vs 19 of 156 [12.1%], p = 1.00, respectively). The finding of similarity in the FTR rate remained consistent during procedural subgroup analysis for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting in group A vs B (22 of 174 [12.6%] vs 9 of 77 [11.7%], p = 1.00, respectively).ConclusionsImplementation of quality improvement initiatives significantly improves outcomes without affecting FTR rates. Further study is needed to determine if FTR provides additive value to quality assessment over existing STS metrics.Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.