-
Comparative Study
[CT-based software-supported prediction of the postoperative lung function after partial resection of the lung].
- F Beyer, W Heindel, P Hoffknecht, J Kuhnigk, V Dicken, T Lange, M Thomas, and D Wormanns.
- Institut für Klinische Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Münster. beyerf@uni-muenster.de
- Rofo. 2006 Sep 1; 178 (9): 872-9.
PurposeThe predicted postoperative forced exspiratory volume in one second (FEV (1)) is an important functional factor for predicting the operability of patients with bronchial carcinoma. A software tool that uses a preoperative chest MSCT and pulmonary function test (PFT) for largely automated prediction of the FEV (1) was evaluated.Materials And MethodsFifteen patients with surgically treated lung cancer were examined with a preoperative chest MSCT (1.25 mm slice thickness, 0.8 mm reconstruction increment) and PFT before and after surgery. CT scans were analyzed by the prototype software MeVisPulmo (MeVis gGmbH, Bremen) that predicted the postoperative FEV (1) as a percentage of the preoperative values measured by PFT. The automated segmentation and volumetry of lung lobes were performed either without or with minimal user interaction. Patients underwent lobectomy in twelve cases (6 upper lobes, 1 middle lobe, 5 lower lobes) and pneumectomy in three cases. The predicted FEV (1) values were compared to the observed postoperative values as a standard of reference. The additional functional parameters "total lung capacity" (TLC) and "forced vital capacity" (FVC) were compared to the FEV (1) results.ResultsAutomated calculation of predicted postoperative lung function was successful in all cases. Due to an implausible PFT, two of the 15 patients were excluded from the collective. A mean postoperative FEV (1) value of 75 % (SD +/- 12 %) of the preoperative FEV (1) was calculated and 74 % (SD +/- 12 %) was actually measured. The deviations of the predicted value from the measured postoperative FEV (1) ranged between - 289 ml (-12 % of the measured postoperative FEV (1)) and + 294 ml (+ 15 % of the postoperative FEV (1)). The mean deviation (absolute value) was 137 +/- 77 ml/s. This corresponds to 7 +/- 3 % of the measured postoperative FEV (1). Bland-Altman-Statistics showed the 95 % "limits of agreement" for the predicted FEV (1) values to be between - 341 ml and + 301 ml, corresponding to - 17.5 % and + 15.8 of the measured postoperative FEV (1) value. Analysis of the TLC and FVC yielded similar results.ConclusionIn the present pilot study the software-assisted prediction of the postoperative FEV (1) using a preoperative MSCT and pulmonary function test corresponded satisfactorily with the observed postoperative values. The introduced approach may make it possible to obtain additional information for the prediction of functional operability prior to performing lung cancer surgery.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.