• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Aug 2015

    Review

    The natural history of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review.

    • Walid Eljabu, Hans Michael Klinger, and Marius von Knoch.
    • Department of Traumatology, Hand Surgery and Orthopaedics, Klinikum Bremerhaven Reinkenheide gGmbH, Bremerhaven, Germany, walid.eljabu@doctors.org.uk.
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Aug 1;135(8):1055-61.

    PurposeTo analyse the current scientific evidence regarding the natural history of the clinical and anatomical progression of rotator cuff tears.MethodsA broad systematic review of the literature (PubMed database through January 2014) which was guided, conducted and reported according to PRISMA criteria. This article focuses on the rotator cuff tears. Articles had to meet an inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of each study was individually assessed using a recently developed general assessment tool AMQPP (assessing the methodological quality of published papers).ResultsSeven articles dealing with rotator cuff tears were included, one of them was a high-quality study. Three papers assessed the natural history and the natural course of rotator cuff rupture directly. The other studies indirectly assessed the natural history with reports on non-operative and operative therapy trends. All of these articles had been published in four different top medical journals according to 2013 ranking. We found no articles which clearly referred to the role of regression to the mean of rotator cuff tears.ConclusionThe development of symptoms and anatomical deterioration are often directly correlated. Spontaneous recovery to normal levels of function has been successfully achieved, and standardised non-operative treatment programmes are an effective alternative to surgery for many patients. Follow-up is necessary to avoid irreparable stage. However, surgery is still favoured by young active people and highly professional persons who need to get fit in a short period of time. Further research is still necessary. The AMQPP score system is simple and reliable. It works as a quick quality-checking tool which helps researchers to identify the key points in each paper and reach a decision regarding the eligibility of the paper more easily.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…