• Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi · Jun 2018

    [Effect of incisor retraction on three-dimensional morphology of upper airway and fluid dynamics in adult class Ⅰ patients with bimaxillary protrusion].

    • F C Sun, W Z Yang, and Y K Ma.
    • Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou Zhejiang 325000, China.
    • Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jun 9; 53 (6): 398-403.

    AbstractObjective: To investigate the effect of incisor retraction on three-dimensional morphology of upper airway and fluid dynamics in class Ⅰ adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion. Methods: Thirty class Ⅰ patients with bimaxillary protrusion that received fixed orthodontic treatment in Department of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University from January 2011 to September 2014 were selected using random number table. All the patients were treated with extraction of four first premolars and retraction of anterior teeth using implant anchorage. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) scans were performed before and after incisor retraction for all patients. The CBCT data of the upper airway were constructed using Mimics 16.0, and the flow field characteristics inside the upper airway were simulated using Ansys 14.0. The changes of volume (V), mean cross-sectional area (mCSA), maximum lateral diameters/maximum anteroposterior diameters (LP/AP) of cross section, the maximum pressure of airflow (P(max)), the minimum pressure of airflow (P(min)) and pressure drop (△P) of nasopharynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx before and after incisor retraction were measured and compared using paired t test. The correlation between the variation of △P in the most significant pharyngeal part and the morphological variables after incisor retraction was analyzed using Pearson correlation test. Results: No statistical differences were observed in the morphology and flow field in nasopharynx before and after incisor retraction (P>0.05). Before incisor retraction, the oropharyngeal volume and mCSA were (7 580±622) mm(3) and (217±40) mm(2), respectively, and the hypopharyngeal volume and mCSA were (2 564±162) mm(3), and (239±43) mm(2), respectively. After incisor retraction, the volumes of oropharynx and hypopharynx were (6 885±601) mm(3) and (2 535±156) mm(3), respectively, and mCSA of oropharynx and hypopharynx were (197±37) mm(2) and (236±42) mm(2), respectively. The volume and mCSA of oropharynx and hypopharynx were significantly decreased after incisor retraction (P<0.05). The greatest changes in pharyngeal volume and mCSA occurred in the oropharynx. In addition, the LP/AP of oropharynx after incisor retraction was changed from 1.9±0.6 to 2.1±0.7, which was significantly increased compared with the levels before incisor retraction (P<0.05). After simulation of pharyngeal airflow, the oropharyngeal P(min), hypopharyngeal P(max) and P(min) were (-13.7±4.3), (-8.3±3.8) and (-42.8±9.5) Pa, respectively, whereas the values turned to (-16.4±6.5), (-11.9±3.6) and (-46.0±11.0) Pa, respectively after incisor retraction, which was significantly reduced (P<0.05). △P of oropharynx was significantly increased from (42.7±10.1) Pa to (45.2±13.0) Pa after incisor retraction (P<0.05) and the variation of oropharyngeal △P was negatively correlated with the variation of V and mCSA in oropharynx before and after incisor retraction (r=-0.681, P=0.001; r=-0.844, P=0.000). Conclusions: The oropharynx was constricted and the pharyngeal resistance was increased after incisor retraction in adult class Ⅰ patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A comprehensive and systematic evaluation of the pharyngeal morphology and ventilatory function were very important for making a scientific and rational clinical treatment plan.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…