• J E Korman, T Ho, J R Hiatt, and E H Phillips.
• Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA.
• Am Surg. 1997 Oct 1; 63 (10): 908-12.

AbstractThis review compares the outcomes of patients who have undergone laparoscopic and open adrenalectomy. Records of all patients who underwent adrenalectomy between January 1993 and December 1996 at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, were reviewed. Ten patients underwent laparoscopic, and ten patients underwent open adrenalectomy. The average age in the laparoscopic group (LA) was 48 years (range, 23-64) and 47 years (range, 28-79) in the open group (OA). The LA had smaller tumor size (2.9 +/- 2.0 versus 6.1 +/- 2.8 cm; P = 0.01), longer operative times (164 +/- 47 versus 124 +/- 29 minutes; P = 0.03), shorter length of postsurgical stay (4.1 +/- 2.5 versus 5.9 +/- 1.1 days; P = 0.05), and fewer days of parenteral pain medication (1.9 +/- 1.8 versus 3.4 +/- 1.0 days; P = 0.04). Although the differences did not reach statistical significance, LA also had lower estimated blood loss (118 +/- 158 versus 210 +/- 172 cc; P = 0.23), less time to oral intake (1.8 +/- 2.2 versus 2.8 +/- 1.3 days; P = 0.24), and less direct cost ($3645 +/- 1502 versus $5752 +/- 2948; P = 0.07). Complications of LA included one patient who had a prolonged ileus and adrenal insufficiency and another patient who required readmission for adrenal insufficiency. Complications of OA included one patient who had a prolonged ileus and one patient who had a 20 per cent pneumothorax. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is the preferred technique in nonmalignant adrenal lesions less than 6 cm in size.

43 keywords...

hide…