• Eur J Cardiothorac Surg · Apr 2016

    Propensity score-matching analysis of hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer†.

    • Hisashi Iwata, Koyo Shirahashi, Hirotaka Yamamoto, Tsutomu Marui, Shinsuke Matsumoto, Yoshimasa Mizuno, Mitsuyoshi Matsumoto, Shohei Mitta, Yusaku Miyamoto, and Hiroyasu Komuro.
    • Department of General and Cardiothoracic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan ihisashi@gifu-u.ac.jp.
    • Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Apr 1; 49 (4): 1063-7.

    ObjectivesVideo-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) lobectomy is classified into hybrid VATS (direct and video vision) and thoracoscopic VATS (video vision only). In this study, the outcomes of hybrid VATS and thoracoscopic VATS for clinical stage I lung cancer were compared using a propensity score-matching analysis.MethodsHybrid and thoracoscopic VATS were performed in 178 and 76 patients, respectively. Propensity scores were calculated using logistic regression analysis and matched within a score of ±0.03 for age, sex, size of tumour, Charlson comorbidity index, preoperative therapy, percent vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, clinical stage, pathological stage and histology.ResultsIn the non-matched analysis, the results for hybrid and thoracoscopic VATS, respectively, were as follows: mean age, 69 ± 9 and 66 ± 10 years (P = 0.04); tumour size, 24 ± 10 and 20 ± 7 mm (P < 0.01); 2-deoxy-2 [F-18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography SUV, 5.6 ± 4.4 and 3.6 ± 3.2 (P < 0.01); clinical stage (IA/IB), 130/48 and 69/7 (P < 0.01); pathological stage (IA/IB/IIA and IIB/IIIA and IIIB), 89/56/15/18 and 57/14/2/3 (P < 0.01); postoperative complications, 66 (37.1%) and 16 (21.1%; P = 0.01); respiratory complications, 32 (18.0%) and 6 (7.9%; P = 0.04); 5-year overall survival (OS), 77.0 and 88.8% (log-rank P = 0.045); and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), 67.2 and 81.1% (log-rank P = 0.02). In 66 matched cases, the results for hybrid and thoracoscopic VATS, respectively, were as follows: mean operative time, 245 ± 96 and 285 ± 85 min (P = 0.01); blood loss, 95 ± 100 and 86 ± 123 ml (P = 0.67); mean duration of drainage, 3.6 ± 2.7 and 3.2 ± 2.2 days (P = 0.37); postoperative complications, 21 (31.8%) and 14 (21.2%; P = 0.17); respiratory complications, 11 (16.7%) and 5 (7.6%; P = 0.11); 5-year OS, 72.5 and 86.0% (log-rank P = 0.25); and 5-year DFS, 68.4 and 77.2% (log-rank P = 0.17).ConclusionsIn this single-institution, propensity score-matched study, hybrid VATS showed a shorter operative time and similar outcomes compared with thoracoscopic lobectomy for clinical stage IA lung cancer.© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.