• Carolin Melcher, Bernd Wegener, Volkmar Jansson, Wolf Mutschler, Karl-Georg Kanz, and Christof Birkenmaier.
• Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie, Physikalische Medizin und Rehabilitation, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Medizinische Fakultät.
• Z Orthop Unfall. 2018 Oct 1; 156 (5): 554-560.

BackgroundLow back pain is a common problem for primary care providers, outpatient clinics and A&E departments. The predominant symptoms are those of so-called "unspecific back pain", but serious pathologies can be concealed by the clinical signs. Especially less experienced colleagues have problems in treating these patients, as - despite the multitude of recommendations and guidelines - there is no generally accepted algorithm.MethodsAfter a literature search (Medline/Cochrane), 158 articles were selected from 15,000 papers and classified according to their level of evidence. These were attuned to the clinical guidelines of the orthopaedic and pain-physician associations in Europe, North America and overseas and the experience of specialists at LMU Munich, in order to achieve consistency with literature recommendations, as well as feasibility in everyday clinical work and optimised with practical relevance.ResultsAn algorithm was formed to provide the crucial differential diagnosis of lumbar back pain according to its clinical relevance and to provide a plan of action offering reasonable diagnostic and therapeutic steps. As a consequence of distinct binary decisions, low back patients should be treated at any given time according to the guidelines, with emergencies detected, unnecessary diagnostic testing and interventions averted and reasonable treatment initiated pursuant to the underlying pathology.ConclusionIn the context of the available evidence, a clinical algorithm has been developed that translates the complex diagnostic testing of acute low back pain into a transparent, structured and systematic guideline.Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.

17 keywords...

hide…