-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Sep 2021
Physician's communication in code status discussions for terminally ill cancer patients in inpatient hospice/palliative care units in Japan: a nationwide post-bereavement survey.
- Yoshiyuki Kizawa, Takashi Yamaguchi, Akihiro Sakashita, Maho Aoyama, Tatsuya Morita, Satoru Tsuneto, Yasuo Shima, and Mitsunori Miyashita.
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan. Electronic address: ykizawa@med.kobe-u.ac.jp.
- J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Sep 1; 62 (3): e120-e129.
ContextCardiopulmonary resuscitation is one of the most important end-of-life care decisions. However, the experience of bereaved families during code status discussions is not well documented.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to describe the degree of emotional distress of bereaved families when discussing code status, identify their perceived areas for improvement and determine associated factors.MethodsThis study is part of a nationwide post-bereavement survey, the Japan Hospice and Palliative care Evaluation 3 (J-HOPE3) study. Questionnaires were sent to the relatives of cancer patients who had died in palliative care units in Japan in 2014.ResultsFrom an analysis of 338 questionnaires, 37% of families reported high emotional distress during code status discussions and 32% reported a need for improvement. Multiple logistic regression analyses revealed the following were associated with high-level distress: the family had hoped for the miraculous and spontaneous recovery of the patient (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-4.43, P = 0.0049), the family felt they could not voice their opinion about Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 2.07, CI 1.12-3.81, P = 0.02), or the physician failed to adapt the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.36, CI 0.18-0.68, P = 0.0015). Factors identified for improvement were: holding discussions in a relaxing atmosphere conducive to questioning (OR 0.36, CI 0.16-0.80, P = 0.012), and ensuring the physician adapted the explanation to the family's preparation level (OR 0.47, CI 0.23-0.96, P = 0.037).ConclusionWe recommend the development of educational programs for code status discussions to improve the experience of bereaved family members.Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.