• Y Hu, W X Dong, X Y Sun, Z S Yuan, J Zhang, H Xie, and C H Wu.
• Department of Spinal Surgery, Ningbo No.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315040, China.
• Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Mar 1; 54 (3): 212-6.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the biomechanical stability of anterior odontoid screw plate (AOSP).MethodsEight fresh-frozen cadaveric cervical spine specimens were subjected to stepwise destabilization of the C1-C3 complex, simulating a type Ⅰ Hangman fracture, type Ⅱ odontoid fracture, and the C2-3 disc injury. Intact specimens, fractured specimens, and fractured specimens with posterior, anterior fixation techniques were divided into six groups: control group (intact), injury group of type Ⅱ odontoid fracture and type Ⅰ Hangman fracture combined with C2-3 disk injury, after anterior cervical plate+ odontoid screw+ cage (ACP+ OS+ cage) group, after anterior odontoid screw plate (AOSP) fixation system group, after affixing rods from pedicle screws in C2 to lateral mass screws in C3+ odontoid screw (C2PS+ C3LMS+ OS) group, after affixing rods from pedicle screws in C1 to pedicle screws in C2 and lateral mass screws in C3 (C1PS+ C2PS+ C3LMS) group. The range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone of C1-C2 and C2-C3 segment was tested.ResultsThere was statistically significant difference between the C1PS+ C2PS+ C3LMS fixation group and the AOSP fixation group of ROMC1-C2(P<0.05). During all loading modes, AOSP+ Bone graft fixation significantly outperformed the ACP+ OS+ cage fixation in limiting ROMC2-C3. During flexion and extension, AOSP fixation significantly outperformed the C1PS+ C2PS+ C3LMS fixation and C2PS+ C3LMS+ OS fixation in limiting ROMC2-C3.ConclusionThe AOSP fixation system has excellent biomechanical performance when dealing with type Ⅰ Hangman fracture, type Ⅱ odontoid fracture, and the C2-3 disc injury, and appear to be a safe and effective technique for dealing with the combined injury.

14 keywords...

hide…