• Li-Hua Dong, Qi-Yu Zhang, Ning-Ning Di, Qiu-Li Xue, and Ya-Jie Liu.
• Department of Intensive Care Unit, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China. dongleehua@163.com.
• Ann Palliat Med. 2020 Sep 1; 9 (5): 2926-2932.

BackgroundSince sepsis-3 definition is more accurate and sensitive than previous sepsis definition, implementation the newest diagnosis criteria could definitely bring more benefit to sepsis patients. This study was done to identify the level of current intensivists' knowledge regarding the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock and its implementation for the diagnosis of sepsis among Chinese adult intensive care units (ICUs).MethodsA nationwide survey amongst critical care physicians was designed. The questionnaires measured the understanding and the frequency of diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock according to the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock. One thousand random physician members of Chinese Society of Critical Care Medicine were involved in the survey. A 5-point Likert scale (totally understand, partially understand, understand, hardly understand, do not understand) was used to elicit answers about the degree of understanding the sepsis-3 definition. The other 5-point Likert scale (always, often, sometimes, rarely, never) was used to elicit answers about the frequency of diagnosing sepsis according to the sepsis-3 definition.ResultsThere were 59 (16.1%) intensivists who could completely understand the sepsis-3 definition. Less practiced intensivists could understand the sepsis-3 definition better than more practiced intensivists (P<0.001). Intensivists from university teaching hospitals understand the sepsis-3 definition better than the intensivists from the community hospitals (P<0.001). Intensivists from small-sized ICUs understand the sepsis-3 definition better than intensivists from big-sized ICUs (P<0.001). There were 60 (16.4%) intensivists who always diagnose sepsis according to the sepsis-3 definition since sepsis-3 published. Less practiced intensivists prefer using the sepsis-3 definition to diagnose sepsis compared with more practiced intensivists (P<0.001). Intensivists from university teaching hospitals prefer using the sepsis-3 definition to diagnose sepsis compared with the intensivists from the community hospitals (P<0.001). Intensivists from small-sized ICUs prefer adapting sepsis-3 definition to diagnosis sepsis compared with intensivists from big-sized ICUs (P<0.001).ConclusionsIn current China, the sepsis-3 definition is well understood and accepted by intensivists.

14 keywords...

hide…