• Arch Orthop Trauma Surg · Oct 2012

    Reliability and consequences of intraoperative 3D imaging to control positions of thoracic pedicle screws.

    • Markus Beck, Robert Rotter, Georg Gradl, Philipp Herlyn, Markus Kröber, Thomas Mittlmeier, and Philip Gierer.
    • Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, St. Bernward Krankenhaus, Treibestrasse 9, 31139 Hildesheim, Germany. Pd.dr.markus.beck@bernward-khs.de
    • Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2012 Oct 1;132(10):1371-7.

    IntroductionThe insertion of thoracic pedicle screws (T1-T10) is subject to a relevant rate of malplacement. The optimum implantation procedure is still a topic of controversial debate. Currently, a postoperative computed tomography is required to evaluate the screw positions. The present study was undertaken to clarify whether intraoperative 3D imaging is a reliable method of determining the position of thoracic pedicle screws.MethodsThis prospective study involved 40 consecutive patients with thoracic spinal injuries, with intraoperative 3D scans being performed to determine the positions of 240 pedicle screws in T1-T10. The results of the 3D scans were compared with the findings of postoperative CT scans, using a clinical classification system.ResultsThe positions of 204 pedicle screws could be viewed by means of both 3D and CT scans and the results compared. The 3D scans achieved a sensitivity of 90.9 % and a specificity of 98.8 %. The rate of misclassification by the 3D scans was 2.5 %. Nine pedicle screws were classified as misplaced and their position corrected intraoperatively (3.8 %). No screws required postoperative revision.ConclusionsPerforming an intraoperative 3D scan enables the position of thoracic pedicle screws to be determined with sufficient accuracy. The rate of revision surgery was reduced to 0 %.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.