• Obstetrics and gynecology · Feb 2017

    Association of Intended Route of Delivery and Maternal Morbidity in Twin Pregnancy.

    • Sarah Rae Easter, Julian N Robinson, Ellice Lieberman, and Daniela Carusi.
    • Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Department of Pediatric Newborn Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
    • Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Feb 1; 129 (2): 305-310.

    ObjectiveTo evaluate maternal morbidity in twin pregnancies according to intended mode of delivery.MethodsWe assembled a 7-year retrospective cohort (2007-2014) of women delivering viable, vertex-presenting twins at or beyond 32 weeks of gestation without contraindication to labor or uterine scar. We classified women as undergoing a trial of labor to attempt vaginal birth or choosing an elective cesarean delivery. Our primary outcome was a measure of composite maternal morbidity including death, postpartum hemorrhage, infection, major procedure, readmission for infection or reoperation, need for dilation and evacuation for hemorrhage or infection, venous thromboembolism, small bowel obstruction or ileus, or intensive care unit admission. Postpartum hemorrhage was defined as estimated blood loss greater than or equal to 1,500 mL or need for transfusion. The rate of lacerations in each group was also determined. Using logistic regression to control for confounders, we examined the odds of maternal morbidity according to intended mode of delivery.ResultsOf 2,272 twin pregnancies at or beyond 32 weeks of gestation, 1,140 (50%) met inclusion criteria with 571 (50%) electing cesarean delivery and 569 (50%) undergoing a trial of labor to attempt vaginal birth. Vaginal delivery of both twins was achieved in 74% (n=418) of women choosing a trial of labor. The rate of maternal morbidity was 12.3% in the trial of labor group compared with 9.1% in the elective cesarean delivery group (P=.08, adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.4). Postpartum hemorrhage was more common among women who attempted vaginal delivery (n=52) compared with those electing cesarean delivery (n=28) with rates of 9.1% compared with 4.9%, respectively (P<.01, adjusted OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.4-3.6) and was responsible for the difference in the composite morbidity rate between groups.ConclusionWhen adjustment is made for potential confounders, women undergoing a trial of labor with twins experience a higher odds of maternal morbidity than those electing cesarean delivery, primarily as a result of hemorrhage. In pragmatic terms, the tradeoff for a 74% chance of vaginal delivery is a 4% absolute increase in the rate of serious postpartum hemorrhage.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.