• Arturo Orea, Lilia Castillo, Víctor Ochoa, Juan Antonio Rull, Francisco Gómez-Pérez, Verónica Rebollar, Jesus Sepulveda, Joel Dorantes, Enrique Asensio, Jorge Oseguera, and Ofelia González.
• Nuclear Medicine Department, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City. artorea@yahoo.com.mx
• Rev Invest Clin. 2004 May 1; 56 (3): 321-6.

UnlabelledGIK solutions improve detection of myocardium viability after acute infarction because they could change the metabolic conditions, improving myocardial perfusion defects.Methods And ResultsSeventy four patients (52 men, 22 women, mean age 53.3.08 +/- 12.14 years) with previous myocardial infarction (evolution time, 4.2 +/- 3.1 months) underwent pharmacological stress (dipyridamole), rest redistribution and reinjection Tl-201 image as well rest/stress Tc-99m Sestamibi, after the intravenous administration of GIK (200 g glucose +/- 30 UI regular insuline +/- 40 mEq potassiumchloride/500 mL in continuous infusion during 3 hours), Group A (N = 22) or oral administration of 70 g of glucose+/- 40 mEq of potassium chloride taking in advantage the endogenous insulin secretion, to non-diabetic patients (group B = GB, N = 26) and group C (GC, diabetic patients N = 26). All of the 74 patients received 10 mg of sublingual Isorbide previous to 25 mCi of Tc99m Sestamibi administration in a different 2 days protocol. A total of 1,480 myocardial segments were assessed and numbered, and the severity of perfusion defects in the segments involved, were compared between Thallium 201 rest reinjection and GIK-MIBI as the main objective of the study. Involved territories number: 4.02 +/- 2.50 vs. 6.88 +/- 2.12, p = 0.005 for AD; 5.2 +/- 1.44 vs. 6.35 +/- 1.11, p = 0.05 for RC and 1.58 +/- 1.01 vs. 2.05 +/- 1.05, p = 0.05 Cx. For GIK-MIBI vs. Tl-201 reinjection respectively, and defect severity: 8.2 +/- 6.04 vs. 13.22 +/- 5.38, p = 0.01 for LAD; 11.72 +/- 5.08 vs. 15.13 +/- 4.42, p = 0.005 for RC and 2.66 +/- 2.09 vs. 4.69 +/- 3.58, p = 0.003 Cx . For GIK-MIBI vs. Tl-201 reinjection respectively, were found.ConclusionOur data suggest that GIK-MIBI protocol is a safe and easy procedure which improves the detection of perfusion reversible defects compared with Tl-201 reinjection, obtaining better information regarding myocardial viability, with lower acquisition time and less cost.

16 keywords...

hide…