• Spine · Nov 2012

    Detection of modern spinal implants by airport metal detectors.

    • Fahad Chinwalla and Michael P Grevitt.
    • Centre for Spinal Studies and Surgery, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
    • Spine. 2012 Nov 15;37(24):2011-6.

    Study DesignProspective cohort observational study.ObjectiveTo determine the detection rates of modern spinal implants by post-9/11 airport metal detectors.Summary Of Background DataThere are few data on the detection rates of modern spinal implants and few that examine the effects of body mass, construct complexity, or implant density.MethodsImplants were tested ex vivo and in vivo using standard arch way metal detectors (AMDs) and handheld metal detectors (HHMDs) in use at the majority of European airports.A volunteer carried individual spinal implants both individually and in various combinations of increasing mass in clothing pockets into the AMD. The same instrumentation was bench tested using HHMD at a distance of 5 cm. Forty patients with modern spinal implants were tested: lumbar disc replacement (8), cervical disc replacement (1), posterior deformity instrumentation (17), anterior deformity instrumentation (2), anterior reconstruction (2), PLIF (6), interspinous distraction device (1), anterior cervical plate (2), and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with cage (1)-all implants were titanium unless indicated. Mean metal mass was 98 g (range, 6-222 g). Subject ages ranged from 13 to 65 years and the mean body mass index was 25 kg/m (range, 15-32).ResultsEx vivo, the AMD did not detect any instrumentation individually or in combination up to a titanium mass of 215 g. The HHMD detected all instrumentation at a distance of 5 cm, with the minimum mass being 2 g. No implants were detected in patients by the AMD.The HHMD did not detect any anterior lumbar or thoracic surgical implants. It detected anterior cervical implants. The HHMD detected all posterior surgical implants. There was no significant relationship between detection rate, body mass index, total metal mass, and metal density/segment.ConclusionAMDs do not detect modern spinal implants. HHMDs detect all modern posterior spinal implants; this has implications for patient documentation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.