-
- KoganAlexis CoulouridesACFrom the Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Dept. of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, Alhambra (ACK, KK, BO); RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (JIB); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (SCA). acoulour@us, Kya Kraus, Bonnie Olsen, Julia I Bandini, and Sangeeta C Ahluwalia.
- From the Keck School of Medicine of USC, University of Southern California, Dept. of Family Medicine and Geriatrics, Alhambra (ACK, KK, BO); RAND Corporation, Boston, MA (JIB); RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA (SCA). acoulour@usc.edu.
- J Am Board Fam Med. 2021 Mar 1; 34 (2): 375-386.
BackgroundAdvance care planning (ACP) is critical for older adults with heart failure; however, patient-level and clinician-level barriers exist. Although a group visit (GV) approach to engage patients in ACP has proven effective among general geriatric populations, little is known about clinician perceptions/likelihood of referral.MethodsQualitative study to understand clinician perspectives on GVs for ACP among older adult patients with heart failure and caregivers. Twenty physicians and advance practice providers participated in telephone-based interviews guided by a semistructured research protocol. Transcripts were analyzed using a grounded theory approach.ResultsResults highlight variability in clinician engagement in ACP but greater agreement around the factors that prompt discussions. Qualitative themes included (1) inherent properties of GVs (characteristics that make GVs ideal for most but less ideal for some, risk-to-benefit ratio); (2) purpose of GVs (general education, "priming the pump" for subsequent discussions, providing tools for action); and (3) format and procedures for GVs (inclusion/exclusion considerations, organizing by unifying characteristic, link back to clinicians).ConclusionsThis is the first study to gain clinician insights into ACP GVs specific to patients and caregivers affected by heart failure. Results shed light on an important topic and suggest key considerations for conducting GVs for ACP.© Copyright 2021 by the American Board of Family Medicine.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.