-
Ultrasound Med Biol · Feb 2016
Comparative StudyShear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
- Florian Desmots, Nicolas Fakhry, Julien Mancini, Anthony Reyre, Vincent Vidal, Alexis Jacquier, Laure Santini, Guy Moulin, and Arthur Varoquaux.
- Department of Radiology, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Laveran, Marseille, France. Electronic address: florian.desmots@yahoo.fr.
- Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016 Feb 1; 42 (2): 387-98.
AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of shear wave elastography (SWE) in comparison to B-mode and Doppler ultrasonography in differentiating benign from malignant head and neck lymph nodes (HNLNs). Sixty-two HNLNs from 56 patients were prospectively examined using B-mode, Doppler and SWE. The standard of reference was histopathology or cytology and follow-up. Qualitative malignant criteria (hilum infiltration, cortical hypo-echogenicity, irregular margins, abnormal vessels) were assessed on a five-point scale. Four quantitative parameters were obtained: long axis length, short axis length, short axis/long axis ratio, resistive index and maximum shear elasticity modulus (μmax). Diagnostic performance was analyzed with special emphasis on the sub-centimeter HNLN subgroup. Thirty HNLNs were malignant (48%). μmax intra-observer reproducibility was 0.899 (0.728 in sub-centimeter subgroup). Malignant HNLNs were stiffer (μmax = 72.4 ± 59.0 kPa) compared with benign nodes (μmax = 23.3 ± 25.3 kPa) (p < 0.001). Among the quantitative criteria, μmax had the highest diagnostic accuracy (area under the curve = 0.903 ± 0.042), especially in the sub-centimeter subgroup (area under the curve = 0.929 ± 0.045; p < 0.001) in which the area under the curve was significantly higher compared with the other quantitative criteria (p < 0.05). The additional use of SWE combined with B-mode tended to improve diagnostic accuracy (p > 0.05). SWE is a promising reproducible quantitative tool with which to predict malignant HNLNs, especially sub-centimeter nodes. Copyright © 2016 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.