-
- Tomohiro Izumi, Toru Hirano, Kei Watanabe, Atsuki Sano, Takui Ito, and Naoto Endo.
- Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Regenerative and Transplant Medicine, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi Dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan, t_izm13@yahoo.co.jp.
- Eur Spine J. 2013 Nov 1;22(11):2569-74.
BackgroundTwo-dimensional imaging is not adequate for evaluating ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of a novel computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) analysis method that we had devised to measure volume changes in OPLL.Subjects And MethodsTwenty OPLL patients (12 male and 8 female; mean age 63.6 years) who were being followed conservatively were examined twice with an interval of at least 1 year between the two scans. The mean interval was 22 (range 12-45) months. A 3D model was created with DICOM data from CT images, using the MIMICS(®) software to calculate the volume. The mean ossification volume was determined from two measurements. Since ossification size varies widely, evaluation of change in volume is generally affected by the original size. Therefore, the change in ossification volume between the first and second CT examinations was calculated as the annual rate of progression.ResultsThe type of OPLL was classified as continuous in 3 patients, segmented in 3, and mixed in 14. The mean ossification volume was 1,831.68 mm(3) at the first examination and 1,928.31 mm(3) at the second, showing a significant mean increase in ossification volume. The mean annual rate of lesion increase was 3.33% (range 0.08-7.79%).ConclusionThe 3D method used allowed detailed OPLL classification and quantification of change in the ossified volume. Thus, this method appears to be very useful for quantitative evaluation of OPLL with only minimal measurement error.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.