-
J. Natl. Cancer Inst. · Dec 2020
Contribution of Germline Predisposition Gene Mutations to Breast Cancer Risk in African American Women.
- Julie R Palmer, Eric C Polley, Chunling Hu, Esther M John, Christopher Haiman, Steven N Hart, Mia Gaudet, Tuya Pal, Hoda Anton-Culver, Amy Trentham-Dietz, Leslie Bernstein, Christine B Ambrosone, Elisa V Bandera, Kimberly A Bertrand, Traci N Bethea, Chi Gao, Rohan D Gnanaolivu, Hongyan Huang, Kun Y Lee, Loic LeMarchand, Jie Na, Dale P Sandler, Payal D Shah, Siddhartha Yadav, William Yang, Jeffrey N Weitzel, Susan M Domchek, David E Goldgar, Katherine L Nathanson, Peter Kraft, Song Yao, and Fergus J Couch.
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, and Slone Epidemiology Center, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
- J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2020 Dec 14; 112 (12): 1213-1221.
BackgroundThe risks of breast cancer in African American (AA) women associated with inherited mutations in breast cancer predisposition genes are not well defined. Thus, whether multigene germline hereditary cancer testing panels are applicable to this population is unknown. We assessed associations between mutations in panel-based genes and breast cancer risk in 5054 AA women with breast cancer and 4993 unaffected AA women drawn from 10 epidemiologic studies.MethodsGermline DNA samples were sequenced for mutations in 23 cancer predisposition genes using a QIAseq multiplex amplicon panel. Prevalence of mutations and odds ratios (ORs) for associations with breast cancer risk were estimated with adjustment for study design, age, and family history of breast cancer.ResultsPathogenic mutations were identified in 10.3% of women with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer, 5.2% of women with ER-positive breast cancer, and 2.3% of unaffected women. Mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 were associated with high risks of breast cancer (OR = 47.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 10.43 to >100; OR = 7.25, 95% CI = 4.07 to 14.12; OR = 8.54, 95% CI = 3.67 to 24.95, respectively). RAD51D mutations were associated with high risk of ER-negative disease (OR = 7.82, 95% CI = 1.61 to 57.42). Moderate risks were observed for CHEK2, ATM, ERCC3, and FANCC mutations with ER-positive cancer, and RECQL mutations with all breast cancer.ConclusionsThe study identifies genes that predispose to breast cancer in the AA population, demonstrates the validity of current breast cancer testing panels for use in AA women, and provides a basis for increased referral of AA patients for cancer genetic testing.© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.