• Nauman S Chaudhry, Alp Ozpinar, Wenya Linda Bi, Vamsidhar Chavakula, John H Chi, and Ian F Dunn.
• Department of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
• World Neurosurg. 2015 Jun 1;83(6):1180.e7-11.

BackgroundBasilar invagination is a rare clinical condition characterized by upward protrusion of the odontoid process into the intracranial space, leading to bulbomedullary compression. It is often encountered in adults with rheumatoid arthritis. Transoral microscopic or endonasal endoscopic decompression may be pursued, with or without posterior fixation. We present a case of basilar invagination with C1-C2 autofusion and discuss an algorithm for choice of anterior versus posterior approaches.Case DescriptionA 47-year-old woman with rheumatoid arthritis presented with severe occipital and cervical pain, dysphagia, hoarseness, and arm paresthesias. Findings on magnetic resonance imaging revealed moderate cranial settling with the odontoid indenting the ventral medulla but no posterior compression. Computed tomography demonstrated bony fusion at C1-C2 without lateral sag. Given autofusion of C1-C2 in proper occipitocervical alignment and the absence of posterior compression, the patient underwent endoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy without further posterior fusion, with satisfactory resolution of symptoms.ConclusionEndoscopic endonasal odontoidectomy offers a safe and effective method for anterior decompression of basilar invagination. Preoperative assessment for existing posterior fusion, absence of posterior compression, and preservation of the anterior C1 ring during operative decompression help stratify the need for lone anterior approach versus a combined anterior and posterior treatment.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

21 keywords...

hide…