• Spine · Oct 2012

    Comparative Study

    Seeing double: a comparison of microstructure, biomechanical function, and adjacent disc health between double- and single-layer vertebral endplates.

    • Aaron J Fields, Francisco Sahli, Azucena G Rodriguez, and Jeffrey C Lotz.
    • Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
    • Spine. 2012 Oct 1; 37 (21): E1310-7.

    Study DesignExperimental and computational assessment of thickness, porosity, biomechanical behavior, and adjacent disc glycosaminoglycan content in double- and single-layer bony endplate samples harvested from human cadaver spines.ObjectiveTo determine if the second layer of bone in double-layer vertebral endplates allows the superficial layer to achieve a more optimal balance between its biomechanical and nutritional functions.Summary Of Background DataProper disc health requires the endplate to balance opposing biomechanical and nutritional functions. Previous studies investigating endplate function report seeing double: some endplates have a second layer of bone. However, it remains unclear whether the second layer of bone has any functional advantage. Such information could shed light on the factors that protect against disc degeneration.MethodsSix lumbar spines were obtained from human cadavers (32-84 yr) and scanned with magnetic resonance imaging. Cylindrical cores that included the endplate and underlying trabecular bone were harvested from the center of the superior vertebral endplates (6 double- and 12 single-layer endplates) and imaged using micro-computed tomography. The thickness and porosity of the bony endplate layers were measured for each core. High-resolution finite element analysis was performed to assess biomechanical behavior. Glycosaminoglycan content within the adjacent nucleus tissue was quantified using the dimethylmethylene blue technique.ResultsThe superficial layer of the double-layer endplates was 50% thinner (P = 0.009) and tended also to be more porous than single-layer endplates. Strains were higher in thinner endplates; however, the second layer of bone in the double-layer endplates had a stiffening effect so that despite being thinner than single-layer endplates, the superficial layer of the double-layer endplates had a similar risk of damage. After adjusting for age, glycosaminoglycan content was significantly higher in the nucleus tissue adjacent to the double-layer endplates (P = 0.01).ConclusionCompared with single-layer endplates, double-layer endplates seem to permit a more optimal balance between endplate biomechanical and nutritional functions, and may therefore offer a significant protective factor against disc degeneration.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.