-
- Atte Karppinen, Leena Kivipelto, Satu Vehkavaara, Elina Ritvonen, Emmi Tikkanen, Riku Kivisaari, Juha Hernesniemi, Kirsi Setälä, Camilla Schalin-Jäntti, and Mika Niemelä.
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland. Electronic address: atte.karppinen@hus.fi.
- World Neurosurg. 2015 Jul 1;84(1):48-57.
ObjectiveAt our institution, a total of 320 patients were operated on between 2000 and 2010 for a newly diagnosed pituitary adenoma. In an attempt to improve quality of tumor resection, the transsphenoidal microscopic technique was replaced by the endoscopic technique in June 2008. This retrospective single center study compares the outcomes after microscopic (n = 144) and endoscopic (n = 41) tumor surgery of all patients operated on for a nonfunctional pituitary adenoma.MethodsTumor size and location, Knosp grade, prevalence of anterior hypopituitarism, diabetes insipidus, visual acuity/fields, complication rates, and operation time were compared between the groups.ResultsAt the 3-month follow-up, hypopituitarism had improved in 7% of patients in the microscopic group and in 9% in the endoscopic group, and had further impaired in 13% and 9%, respectively. At the 3-month follow-up magnetic resonance imaging, a total tumor removal was achieved in 45% versus 56% of patients, respectively (P = not significant [NS]). Visual fields had normalized or improved in 90% versus 88% of patients, respectively (P = NS). Postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred in 3.5% versus 2.4% (P = NS), and diabetes insipidus (transient or permanent) in 7.6% versus 4.9% (P = NS) of cases, respectively. Larger tumor size (P < 0.0005) and endoscopic technique (P = 0.03) were independent predictors of increased mean operative time.ConclusionsInitial results with the endoscopic technique were statistically similar to those achieved with the microscopic technique. However, there was a trend toward improved outcomes and fewer complications in the endoscopic group.Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.