• Diego Ruiz-López and Alberto Alonso-Babarro.
• Equipo de Soporte Paliativo Domiciliario (ESAPD), Centro de Salud Legazpi, Dirección Asistencial Noroeste de Atención Primaria, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, Madrid, España. Electronic address: diego.ruiz@salud.madrid.org.
• Aten Primaria. 2021 Jun 1; 53 (6): 102040102040.

ObjectivePain is the fearest and disabling symptom for cancer patients. The cornerstone of treatment is opioid analgesics. The objective of this research was to relate the opioid consumption existing in the Community of Madrid (CM) with the prescription habits expressed by the Primary Care (PrC) and Palliative Care (PalC) physicians.DesignAn opioid prescription habits questionnaire was designed. Sampling was consecutive non-probability. SITE: PrC and specific PalC resources in the CM.ParticipantsThe study population included all the family doctors who worked in PrC in the Madrid Public Health Service and all the physicians who worked in some specific PalC resources, both home-based teams and supportive hospital teams in the CM of the public and private/concerted health network services.Main MeasurementsWe asked about the strong and weak opioids most used in moderate-severe oncological and non-oncological pain, the preferred administration route, the safety in the use of opioids in the treatment of pain and the preferred clinical practice guidelines.ResultsThe questionnaire was answered by 840 PrC physicians (20%) and 56 PalC physicians (45%). For the treatment of moderate-severe cancer pain in both groups of professionals, the first choice was morphine; however, in non-cancer pain for PrC it was fentanyl and morphine for PalC professionals. Regarding the route of administration, 70% of family doctors and 87% of PalC physicians stated that the oral route was the first choice, compared to 27% in PrC and 5% in PalC who preferred the transdermal route. The PrC physicians rated their ability to use opioids as average (4-7/10), while the palliativists considered it as high (8-10/10). In PrC, they declared that they knew, above all, the European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines, although the largest number answered that they trusted their experience. PalC physicians preferred to use the EAPC guide.ConclusionsThere is a clear disagreement between the actual consumption of opioids and the prescribing habits manifested by family doctors, as well as a false certainty in prescribing these drugs.Copyright © 2021. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.

20 keywords...

hide…