• J-M Brinkman, C Hurschler, A E Staubli, and R J van Heerwaarden.
• Department of Orthopaedics, Limb Deformity Reconstruction Unit, Sint Maartenskliniek, P.O. Box 8000, 3440 JD Woerden, The Netherlands. justusmartijn@gmail.com
• Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2011 Jul 1; 19 (7): 1090-8.

PurposeAn important disadvantage of the standard medial closing-wedge distal femur osteotomy for lateral compartment osteoarthritis of the knee is the immediate effects on the extensor mechanism function. Therefore, a novel bi-plane osteotomy technique was developed. The stability and stiffness of this newly developed technique and a modification of the proximal screw configuration were tested in a composite femur model and compared to the standard single-plane technique. Research question was if the new bi-plane technique and/or modified screw configuration would improve the stability and stiffness of the construct.MethodsIn 12 femurs, motion at the osteotomy under axial and torsion loading was measured using a 3D motion analysis system. All were subsequently tested to failure. The data recorded were used to calculate stability and stiffness of the constructs.ResultsThe stability and stiffness were highest in the bi-plane technique under axial loads, but were lower under torsional loading, compared to the single-plane technique. The screw configuration modification improved axial stability and stiffness, but had no influence on torsional stability.ConclusionIn replicate femurs, the new bi-plane technique improved axial stability, but in contrast to what was theorized, decreased torsional stability, compared to the single-plane technique. The addition of a bi-cortical screw proximally improved stability under axial loading, but not torsion. Further clinical testing will have to prove if early full weight bearing using the new bi-plane technique is possible.

9 keywords...

hide…