-
J Am Soc Echocardiogr · Oct 2007
Implementation of an objective testing system in noninvasive cardiac imaging for evaluation of pediatric cardiology fellows.
- Minghua Hao, Holly M Ippisch, Rana S Cook, Douglas J Perry, William M Gottliebson, Russel Hirsch, and Thomas R Kimball.
- Division of Cardiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, USA. Minghua.Hao@cchmc.org
- J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Oct 1; 20 (10): 1211-8.
IntroductionCurrent evaluation of pediatric cardiology fellow performance is subjective and qualitative. More objective tools are recommended by credentialing boards and may provide more effective evaluation and education.ObjectiveA series of training level-specific multiple-choice tests were developed and evaluated for their effectiveness as evaluation and educational tools for pediatric cardiology fellows.MethodsImaging tests were created by 3 attending physicians and one sonographer with combined expertise in echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac computed tomography. Test content was derived from educational materials, textbooks, journal articles, and lectures previously given to the fellows. The tests were computerized and installed on the hospital intranet. After completion of each test, a posttest session was conducted between the fellow and the director of echocardiography to review concepts surrounding incorrect answers. A survey of the test use was then completed by each fellow.ResultsFour progressively more difficult tests corresponding to each 1-month image rotation and an advanced fifth test for fellows intending to subspecialize in noninvasive cardiac imaging were created. Fifteen fellows took 39 tests (test 1, 15 fellows; test 2, 9 fellows; test 3, 9 fellows; test 4, 4 fellows; and test 5, 2 fellows). The difficulty level of the tests was similar relative to fellow academic level. The majority of fellows welcomed more objective data provided by the tests and 93% of the fellows stated the posttest session was educational.ConclusionImplementation of a fellow testing system using training level-specific computerized questions and images provides objective data for fellow performance evaluations and is a unique and beneficial educational tool.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.