• Mirna Martínez-Saucedo, Samara Téllez-Camacho, Guillermo Aquino-Jarquín, Rocío Sánchez-Urbina, and Javier T Granados-Riverón.
• Laboratory of Genomics, Genetics and Bioinformatics Research, Hospital Infantil de México "Federico Gómez", Secretaría de Salud, Mexico City.
• Gac Med Mex. 2020 Jan 1; 156 (6): 523-526.

AbstractTraditional peer review is undergoing increasing questioning, given the increase in scientific fraud detected and the replication crisis biomedical research is currently going through. Researchers, academic institutions, and research funding agencies actively promote scientific record analysis, and multiple tools have been developed to achieve this. Different biomedical journals were founded with post-publication peer review as a feature, and there are several digital platforms that make this process possible. In addition, an increasing number biomedical journals allow commenting on articles published on their websites, which is also possible in preprint repositories. Moreover, publishing houses and researchers are largely using social networks for the dissemination and discussion of articles, which sometimes culminates in refutations and retractions.Copyright: © 2020 Permanyer.

13 keywords...

hide…