• Spine · Nov 2012

    Multicenter Study

    Growing rods for the treatment of scoliosis in children with cerebral palsy: a critical assessment.

    • Mark J McElroy, Paul D Sponseller, Jonathan R Dattilo, George H Thompson, Behrooz A Akbarnia, Suken A Shah, Brian D Snyder, and Growing Spine Study Group.
    • Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University/Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center, 4940 Eastern Ave., Baltimore, MD 21224, USA.
    • Spine. 2012 Nov 15;37(24):E1504-10.

    Study DesignRetrospective analysis.ObjectiveTo evaluate, in children with cerebral palsy, the following aspects of growing rod (GR) treatment for scoliosis: structural effectiveness, effect of pelvic fixation, hospital stay duration, and complications.Summary Of Background DataChildren with cerebral palsy frequently develop severe spinal deformity and pelvic obliquity (PO). Growth-preserving strategies are attractive, but comorbidities raise the risk/benefit ratio. To our knowledge, no previous studies have focused on growth-preserving spine surgery in these children.MethodsFrom our multicenter patient group, we identified 27 children with cerebral palsy treated with GRs (single rod in 4; dual rods in 23 [15 extending to the pelvis]). We collected radiographical, surgical, hospital stay, and major complication data. We compared Cobb angle and PO improvement between patients with and without pelvic instrumentation via the Student t test (significance, P = 0.05). No patient required anterior spinal fusion.ResultsAverage improvements for all patients (preoperative to latest follow-up) were: Cobb angle, 35° ± 23°; PO, 14° ± 19°; T1-S1 length, 7.9 ± 4.4 cm; and space available for lung ratio, 0.17 ± 0.21. For the 8 patients who underwent fusion, average improvements (preoperative to postfusion) were: Cobb angle, 43° ± 28°; PO, 2° ± 21°; T1-S1 length, 9.5 ± 6.0 cm; and space available for lung ratio, 0.26 ± 0.28. Pelvic GR fixation produced better PO correction (P < 0.001) but similar Cobb angle correction (P = 0.556). Hospital stays averaged 8.7 ± 12.1 days after initial surgery, 1.4 ± 2.5 days after lengthening (45% were outpatient procedures), and 13.4 ± 6.2 days after fusion. The most common complication was deep wound infection (30%).ConclusionGRs via a posterior-only approach are effective. Constructs extending to the pelvis control PO more effectively. However, 30% of patients experienced deep wound infection.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…