• Gynecologic oncology · Feb 2014

    Regional variation in surgical assessment of lymph nodes for staging among women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.

    • Kathleene T Ulanday, Kristy K Ward, Caroline A Macera, Ming Ji, and Steven C Plaxe.
    • San Diego State University Graduate School of Public Health, San Diego, CA, USA.
    • Gynecol. Oncol. 2014 Feb 1; 132 (2): 411-5.

    ObjectiveTo investigate geographical and socioeconomic variations in performance of lymph node dissection for the evaluation of patients with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer.MethodsA population-based, retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program for 15 geographic registries and county-level measures. Women with early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer registered between 2000 and 2008 with known lymph node assessment status were studied. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the differences in the likelihood of lymph node assessment according to geographic SEER region.ResultsAfter adjusting for tumor characteristics, demographics, and area-based socioeconomic measures, a significant relationship between SEER region and lymph node dissection remained. Compared to the region with the highest proportion of lymph node dissection, there is a significantly lower probability of surgical assessment of lymph nodes in 8 of the remaining 14 geographical regions.ConclusionsThe variation in ovarian cancer surgical care by region reported in this study has implications for access and outcomes for patients with early-stage disease. Study findings merit further investigation and should be characterized to permit targeted interventions aimed at reducing the observed disparities.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…