• M de la Matta Martín, A Forastero Rodríguez, and J L López Romero.
• Servicio de Anestesiología y Reanimación, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla. mdlmattam@hotmail.com
• Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2011 Oct 1; 58 (8): 485-92.

Background And ObjectivesLittle information is available on the use of computerized systems in preanesthetic assessment. Our aim was to evaluate staff acceptance of a computerized system for the structured recording of preoperative assessment data in our hospital. The time taken to complete the assessment was compared to the time usually taken to record the information on paper.Material And MethodsObservational, descriptive cross-sectional survey of user satisfaction 3 months after the system had been launched. We later carried out a prospective observational study of 796 preanesthetic assessment visits, comparing the mean time the users took to record information on paper to the time required to enter the data into the computer, analyzing differences between anesthesiologists and according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and patient age.ResultsA total of 401 paper records and 395 electronic files were included. The users believed that the computerized system improved quality and accessibility of recorded data and clinical decision-making. The time required to enter data into the computer was believed to be the main drawback; the users took a mean (SD) 15.21 (5.41) minutes to enter the electronic data and 13.37 (5.08) minutes to record the information on paper (P < .001). There were also significant differences in the time taken to record data according to ASA classification and between anesthesiologists (P < .001).ConclusionsIn spite of drawbacks such as extra time taken to record electronic data, the users perceived benefits, such as improved quality and accessibility of records. For this reason, the computerized system was well accepted.

11 keywords...

hide…