• Asvin M Ganapathi, Brent C Lampert, Nahush A Mokadam, Sitaramesh Emani, Ayesha K Hasan, Robert Tamer, and Bryan A Whitson.
• Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Asvin.Ganapathi@osumc.edu.
• J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2023 Feb 1; 165 (2): 724733.e7724-733.e7.

ObjectiveIn 2018, the heart allocation system changed status classifications and broadened geographic distribution. We examined this change at a national level based on the immediate pre- and postchange periods.MethodsUsing the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients database, we identified all adult primary, isolated heart transplants from October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2019. Two time periods were compared: (1) October 18, 2017, to October 17, 2018 (pre); and (2) October 18, 2018, to October 17, 2019 (post). Comparisons were made between groups, and a multivariable logistic regression model was created to identify factors associated with pretransplant temporary mechanical circulatory support. Volume analysis at the regional, state, and center level was also conducted as the primary focus.ResultsA total of 5381 independent heart transplants were identified within the time frame. On unadjusted analysis, there was a significant increase in temporary mechanical circulatory support (pre, 11.1%; post, 36.2%, P < .01) and decrease in waitlist days (pre, 93 days; post, 41 days; P < .01). Distance traveled (nautical miles) (pre, 83; post, 225; P < .01) and ischemic time (hours) (pre, 3.0; post, 3.4; P < .01) were significantly increased. On multivariable analysis, the postallocation time period was independently associated with temporary MCS (odds ratio, 4.463; 95% confidence interval, 3.844-5.183; P < .001). Transplant volumes did not significantly change after the allocation change at a regional, state, and center level.ConclusionsSince the planned alteration to the allocation system, there have been changes in the use of temporary mechanical circulatory support as well as distance and ischemic time associated with transplant, but no significant volume changes were observed. Continued observation of outcomes and volume under the new allocation system will be necessary in the upcoming years.Copyright © 2021 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…